Prime Championship Results Analysis!


A. INTRODUCTION:
WRITTEN BY Mark Logie

I’ve been having a look at some of the results from the first 35 PRIME CHAMPIONSHIPS , which have been carefully compiled by I Rebel - A Star Wars: Destiny Podcast. My professional background is in statistics, so Claus Staal asked me to do a bit of number crunching and see what I can find out from these results.

First off, I only have access to the TOP CUT numbers for these tournaments. This means that while my data is a bit limited, I’m sort of looking at lots of mini-tournaments between players who were all good enough to make it to the top cut of a PRIME CHAMPIONSHIP. I’ve got data on 24 Top8’s and 11 Top4’s, so a total of 236 DECKS battling it out in 201 MATCHES (we are assuming the games were single elimination, best of three), which is a pretty good place to start.

Here’s what I’ve found.

[EDITOR'S NOTE]: There were 5 Prime Championships taking place since the writing of this article. The winning decks were: eYoda/eBail (1), ePalp/eWatto (1) and eChopper Droids/FC (3). We'll include these results in our next analysis, but it doesn't seem to really upset the current data.

1. POPULARITY:
(REYLO'S #1, BUT CHOPPER AND APHRA IS CATCHING UP!)
Graph1jpg

My graph above shows every deck that has appeared at least twice, while one-of-a-kind off-meta decks are labelled “other”. I’ve split the bars to show how many of these TOP CUTS (blue) resulted in an OVERALL VICTORY (green).

You can see that although 4-LOM Supports, Palpatine decks (split into ePalp/Jabba/LM, ePalp/eMotti and ePalp/eWatto), Aphra Supports and ReyLo have racked up a decent number of victories, it looks close to what you might expect given how popular these decks are. Chopper Droids has a big slice of green suggesting they might be doing better than expected and “other” has a tiny slice of green suggesting they’re doing badly (in terms of converting top cut placements into Prime Championship wins): more on this later.

2. THE EFFECT OF WORLDS 2019:
In order to understand the effect of a large tournament, like the WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP 2019, on the meta and representation of decks, I've split the data into the early 15 (pre-Worlds) and recent 20 (post-Worlds) Prime Championships. This is what that looks like:

Graph2jpg

There’s clearly been a bit of a meta shake-up since Worlds 2019. e4-LOM/Grievous/Sentinel has increased from 4% to 9%, and Chopper Droids have increased from 11% to 18%. Not surprising given the fact that they placed first and second at Worlds.

ReyLo on the other hand has been steadily declining in popularity and has been overtaken by both Chopper Droids and Aphra decks, while it was the most popular deck by quite a margin prior to Worlds 2019.

Off-meta decks have more than halved in popularity, from 11% to 5%, as the meta seems to be solidifying around key character line-ups.

And the last thing to note: Mill is on the rise (1% to 4%). This surge in popularity can probably be attributed to Matt Phillips' top4 feat at Worlds (with eYoda/eLeia).

3. DECK PERFORMANCE:
(ACCOUNTING FOR POPULARITY)

Working out how well a deck is performing while accounting for popularity is a little tricky, but I had some time on my hands, so I wrote a computer program to run a series of simulations. In each simulation, I got the computer to replay all the top cuts of every Prime 10,000 times, and give me the results of these tournaments. I then worked out the average deck performance from these simulations, and the range of results we could expect purely by random chance.

I compared this random range to actual deck performance, to give an ADJUSTED PERFORMANCE SCORE for each deck.

All this produced a lot of data, so I’ve summarised the lot in this colourful graph:
Graph3jpg

Those COLOURED DOTS show the deck’s performance score. In these results, 0 is average performance, anything above the line is good, anything below the line is bad. I’ve coloured by performance: red is bad, blue is average, green is good.

Those BOXES on the graph show what sort of performance you’d expect half of the time (the inter-quartile range for you stats nerds) so we expect about half the decks to fall within the boxes (blue) and half outside (red or green), which is pretty much what we see.

The little LINES (known as whiskers) show the range of performance you’d expect 9 times out of 10, so if your deck performance sits outside these whiskers, the deck is performing either really well (dark green), or really badly (dark red).
gauntlet link THUMBNAILjpg

3.1. WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN?
Of the five decks that have racked up the most wins so far: Chopper Droids (9 wins), Aphra Supports (5), 4-LOM Supports (3), Han Droids (3) and ReyLo (3), all except ReyLo are performing slightly better than you’d expect given representation. ReyLo on the other hand is doing very badly considering how many people are playing it.

The other decks that are doing well are Palp3 decks and Thrawn Supports, though the latter has only had two outings so far so it’s a bit early to tell.

Chopper Droids are really outperforming their representation, while Satine Droids seem to be underperforming. Prior to the C-3P0 nerf, Satine Droids was looking like the stronger of these two decks. But the nerf really hit Satine Droids hard. Chopper Droids on the other hand weren’t too badly affected, and this is what we’re seeing the effect of in the results.

Prior to Worlds 2019, e4-LOM/Grievous/Sentinel decks were massively outperforming their very small representation, but as popularity in this deck has grown, it seems to be performing a bit more averagely. This may mean that its early performance was a bit of a fluke, or maybe players with less experience of this deck are giving it a go while the rest of the field are getting used to how to combat its strategies.

Off-meta decks are doing very poorly. If you turn up with an off-meta deck idea, you should expect to do badly, though I personally always love seeing off-meta decks at the top tables.

4. AFFILIATION:
(IS THERE BALANCE IN THE FORCE?)

Star Wars Destiny is a game which has always had a very thematic feel to it - at least that is what many players want it to be. While it in pure game terms means very little whether a hero or villain decks win or lose, it does however determine many players' perception of a perceived balance in the game (or lack thereof). Here’s how popularity of villain versus hero stacks up:
Graph4jpg

It’s somewhat even, which is nice to see. However, about two thirds of hero decks out there are R2-D2/C-3P0 decks. I’d love to see another hero deck pop up in the meta (though personally, I hope it's not going to be a mill deck), but at the moment it looks like villain have the biggest bag of tricks (Palpatine, Aphra and various Delve/Fist).

5. DOES THE META NEED A SHAKE-UP?
Graph5jpg
We were recently told by Matt Holland, FFG Community Coordinator, on Facebook that there might be a meta shakeup before COVERT MISSIONS drops. Looking at the results of this analysis, if something is going to be nerfed, Hero Droids and Villain Supports seem like the most likely target (nothing new there). If these decks are hit, it could really shake things up.

However, looking at the wide range of decks being played, it seems like the meta is pretty healthy. At the moment, the 4 most popular decks account for about 50% of the meta. Compare this to the US GRAND CHAMPIONSHIP at Nova 2019, which took place before the most recent round of nerfs, where the 4 most popular decks accounted for 78% of the meta (Jabba 3wide, Satine Droids, Chopper Droids and ReyLo).

PATREON SUPPORT:


As a Patron you support the YOUR Destiny website, podcast and YouTube Channel, and you help us to continue providing content for Star Wars Destiny. We are a dedicated Destiny website and release articles almost daily. As Patron you also get access to our Chat 'N' Play videos, and can enter our Patron only Discord Channel. Advanced and Expert tier patrons get access to exclusive training and test videos. Thank you for your consideration.